Later school start times is no solution for teenagers

Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering statewide issues that affect all Californians. Sign up for WeeklyMatters for a Saturday morning digest of the latest news and commentary from the Golden State.

This story is part of California Voices, a commentary forum aiming to broaden our understanding of the state and spotlight Californians directly impacted by policy or its absence. Learn more here.

By Al Mijares, Orange County Superintendent of Schools

Al Mijares is Orange County Superintendent of Schools, amijares@ocde.us. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.

Editor’s note: This commentary is in response to: “A trifecta for children?” Dan Walters, Sept. 30, 2019.

As educators, we are always looking to improve the well-being and success of each of our students. In his column, Dan Walters opines that Senate Bill 328 furthers that goal by mandating later start times for middle and high school classes.

It may be true that students with better sleep patterns can be more successful, and, let’s face it, we all want our kids to be well-rested as they start their days.

Yet a multi-year study in the research journal SLEEP and findings from researchers at the UC Davis Sleep Laboratory challenge the argument that students would get persistent benefits from a shift in their school start time.

Not only would mandating a later start time across the board not have the desired effect, it would impose a hardship on too many working families. In fact, this bill would disproportionately burden students whose socio-economic status is already a significant educational barrier.

While it may be easy enough for some families with flexible schedules to adjust, in some communities, parents who are working just to make ends meet don’t have the luxury of delaying the start of their workday.

The indisputable reality in many of our communities is that students have to begin their day at the same time as their parents.

  1. Become a CalMatters member today to stay informed, bolster our nonpartisan news and expand knowledge across California.

These children are already arriving early to school if their parents are commuting, are farmworkers, or work in construction, restaurants or retail. Even with later start times, many of these parents will still have to drop their kids off at school before they go to work.

These students won’t be getting any more sleep, and the additional idle unsupervised time alone could put them in danger. Parents shouldn’t have to choose between keeping their jobs and ensuring the safety of their children.

And this doesn’t take into account the back end of the school day, when many families rely on older siblings to look after younger children. SB 328 by Sen. Anthony Portantino, Democrat from La Cañada Flintridge, would also push after-school activities later into the evenings.

In California, 45% of children live in low-income households and 46% of those families are single-parent families. The idea that SB 328 will not harm any students ignores the real-world constraints under which working-class families and single parents operate.

I am disappointed that Mr. Walters falls into the trap of characterizing arguments against SB 328 as adult “convenience above the welfare of the children they are supposed to be educating.”

Maybe he assumes that every community has the means to adjust their work schedules. Perhaps a few can, but certainly not all. And each community is in a better position than the state to decide what is best for local students and their parents.

Al Mijares is Orange County Superintendent of Schools, amijares@ocde.us. He wrote this commentary for CalMatters.

Read more from CalMatters

Get breaking news on your phone.

Keep up with the latest via our app.

Receive updates in your inbox.

“CalMatters sets a high bar, offering dedicated coverage and expert reporters that ask tough questions and hold our leaders responsible.”

Featured CalMatters Member

Members make our mission possible.

The Latest

People smile and cry in celebration while seated in a row of green chair inside a hearing room at the state capitol.

Reparations supporters plot comeback after bitter defeat in California Legislature

California Health and Human Services Agency Secretary Dr. Mark Ghaly speaks at a press <a href=conference in the California State Capitol following the first COVID-19 death in California. Photo by Anne Wernikoff for CalMatters" width="400" height="300" />

The doctor who shaped Gavin Newsom’s COVID response is stepping down

Two individuals look at a screen with an AI generated face on it, <a href=as the the words "DIGITAL HUMANS WITH UNITY" appear on the wall above the screen. To their left, another face looks out towards the space." width="400" height="300" />

What California lawmakers did to regulate artificial intelligence

The profile of Assemblymember Evan Low with another lawmaker in the distance and a out-of-focus rainbow flag on the edge of the frame.

Cashing in? A California tribe bought campaign ads for lawmaker who cast key gambling vote

A person wearing a grey polo shirt and blue jeans, sits on a desk, while a computer monitor stands on the desk, in an office.

Public private coalition, seeking to promote equity, creates opportunities for small and minority-owned Californian businesses